Really, it is a good thing to keep pets at one's own, especially when they are useful and unharmful to health; however, this pet loving, I think, should not be as excessive, as one loves his son of daughter. That is to say, if we take a short glimpse at a nation of pet lovers, we will surely find out an obvious paradoxical society. This can be highlighted in the fact of the people who are frittering away lots of budget just for their pets as dogs or cats. Meanwhile, on the other side of the world the needy and homeless people are suffering deeply from destitution, contagious diseases, frustration, and widespread apathy. So what rights must we call for? Human rights? Animal rights? Or both?
Undoubtedly, the right answer is much clear. Of course, this does not mean that one should throw his lovely pets from the window, but the thing that should be thrown away is selfishness and blindness. Personally speaking, I am frond of keeping pets (cats), but not to the level of spending my time or money more than enough just for my pampered pets. It is unreasonable to have your lunch with your dog on the same table. Likewise, this fondness of loving pets may go further to the level of sleeping or kissing (or having sex).for example, when I was a student at Mly Ismail university, I had a sort of admiration towards a girl who was studying French literature. I managed to make her as a friend. But one day she told me that she had kissed her little puppy dog. As a result of this, I began to dislike her until we put an end to our friendship. How dirty she was! If you are not willing to stop eating dinner with your dog (or cat) on the same dish, you are then experiencing a psychological disease.
Perhaps, it maybe a kind of pet addition. Anyway, I support the idea of keeping pets at home but not at the expense of other poor people who are in need of our help and sympathy.
